From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drayton v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
May 26, 2006
Civil Action No. 2:06cv65-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. May. 26, 2006)

Summary

construing the Rule 35 and Rule 36 motion as a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction

Summary of this case from United States v. Moore

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:06cv65-MHT (WO).

May 26, 2006


OPINION


Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, petitioner filed this habeas-corpus case. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the habeas-corpus request be denied because the required permission has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Also before the court are petitioner's objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the objections should be overruled and the magistrate judge's recommendation adopted.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.


Summaries of

Drayton v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
May 26, 2006
Civil Action No. 2:06cv65-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. May. 26, 2006)

construing the Rule 35 and Rule 36 motion as a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction

Summary of this case from United States v. Moore
Case details for

Drayton v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS DRAYTON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: May 26, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:06cv65-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. May. 26, 2006)

Citing Cases

Drayton v. Fisher

Drayton appealed his convictions, and the Eleventh Circuit affirmed in 1998. United States v. Morrow, 156…

United States v. Moore

Moore has not obtained leave from the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit to file a second or…