From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dorr v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 28, 2014
Case No. 13-14526 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 28, 2014)

Summary

noting that Yaldu applies equally in the context of determining eligibility for a loan modification

Summary of this case from Jones v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC

Opinion

Case No. 13-14526

03-28-2014

Carol Dorr, Plaintiff, v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Defendant.


Honorable Sean F. Cox

Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives


ORDER

ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

This is a mortgage case. In August 2013, Plaintiff Carol Dorr filed her Complaint in Genesee County Circuit court against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A, alleging that Defendant committed various torts and violated several statutes with regard to her mortgage loan modification process. Defendant removed the case to this Court on October 29, 2013. (Doc. #1).

On November 1, 2013, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss And/Or For Summary Judgment (Doc. #2). This Court referred the motion to Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). (Doc. #5).

On March 3, 2014, Magistrate Judge Komives issued a Report and Recommendation wherein he recommended that this Court grant Defendant's motion to dismiss. (Doc. #8).

Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a matter by a Magistrate Judge must file objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the R&R. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2). "The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Furthermore, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Therefore, the Court hereby ADOPTS the March 3, 2014 R&R. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion To Dismiss (Doc. #2) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on March 28, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Jennifer McCoy

Case Manager


Summaries of

Dorr v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 28, 2014
Case No. 13-14526 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 28, 2014)

noting that Yaldu applies equally in the context of determining eligibility for a loan modification

Summary of this case from Jones v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC
Case details for

Dorr v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:Carol Dorr, Plaintiff, v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 28, 2014

Citations

Case No. 13-14526 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 28, 2014)

Citing Cases

Wheat v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.

Plaintiff does not allege that Defendant performed any abusive debt collection practices; instead, Plaintiff…

Jones v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC

See Yaldu v. Bank of America Corp, 700 F. Supp. 2d 832, 846 (E.D. Mich. March 31, 2010) (noting that a lender…