From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. Rollins College

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jul 29, 2021
6:18-cv-1069-RBD-LRH (M.D. Fla. Jul. 29, 2021)

Opinion

6:18-cv-1069-RBD-LRH

07-29-2021

JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, v. ROLLINS COLLEGE, Defendant.


ORDER

ROY B. DALTON JR., United States District Judge

On March 25, 2021, Defendant filed a proposed Bill of Costs, seeking $13, 846.95. (Doc. 206.) Plaintiff objected the Bill of Costs, arguing Defendant failed to describe the expenses with particularity or provide proof of payment for the costs. (Doc. 208.) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman recommends sustaining in part and overruling in part Plaintiff's objections and recommends awarding Defendant $6, 467.18 in costs. (Doc. 233 (“R&R”).)

No party objected to the R&R, and the time for doing so has passed. Absent objection, the Court examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2016); see also Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety.

It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 233) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order.

2. Plaintiffs Objections to Defendant's Bill of Costs (Doc. 208) are SUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part.

3. Defendant is AWARDED taxable costs in the amount of $6, 467.18.

4. The remainder of Defendant's requested costs are DENIED.

AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Doe v. Rollins College

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jul 29, 2021
6:18-cv-1069-RBD-LRH (M.D. Fla. Jul. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Doe v. Rollins College

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, v. ROLLINS COLLEGE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jul 29, 2021

Citations

6:18-cv-1069-RBD-LRH (M.D. Fla. Jul. 29, 2021)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.

(“The court will not tax costs for ‘shipment of depositions or costs for binders, tabs, and technical…

Star2star Commc'ns v. AMG Grp. of Brunswick

“Failure to provide sufficient detail or supporting documentation verifying the costs incurred and the…