From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. Miles Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two
Feb 18, 1997
190 Ariz. 173 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997)

Summary

In Miles v. Armour, 239 Mo. 438, 144 S.W. 424, 426, the trial court struck defendant's pleadings and rendered default judgment against him because of his refusal to testify by deposition in a foreign state.

Summary of this case from City of Columbia v. Bil-Nor Construction Co.

Opinion


945 P.2d 1304 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 1997) 190 Ariz. 173 A. DOE, a single person, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MILES INC.; Armour Pharmaceutical Co.; Baxter Healthcare Corporation; Alpha Therapeutic Corporation; Rhone-Poulenc, Inc.; Arizona Board of Regents; University of Arizona; University of Arizona College of Medicine; State of Arizona; Dr. James Corrigan and Carolyn Corrigan; St. Joseph's Hospitals&sMedical Center; Catholic Healthcare West, Defendants/Appellees. Jane DOE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of B. Doe, deceased child of Jane Doe, for and on behalf of herself and on behalf of the Estate, and in her individual capacity, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MILES INC.; Armour Pharmaceutical Co.; Baxter Healthcare Corporation; Alpha Therapeutic Corporation; Rhone-Poulenc, Inc.; Arizona Board of Regents; University of Arizona; University of Arizona College of Medicine; State of Arizona; Dr. James Corrigan and Carolyn Corrigan; St. Joseph's Hospitals&sMedical Center; Catholic Healthcare West, Defendants/Appellees. Nos. 2 CA-CV 96-0166, 2 CA-CV 96-0167. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Second Division, Department A February 18, 1997

       Redesignated as Opinion and Publication Ordered April 9, 1997. Review Granted Nov. 14, 1997.

       Redesignated a Memorandum Decision on May 27, 1998.


Summaries of

Doe v. Miles Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two
Feb 18, 1997
190 Ariz. 173 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997)

In Miles v. Armour, 239 Mo. 438, 144 S.W. 424, 426, the trial court struck defendant's pleadings and rendered default judgment against him because of his refusal to testify by deposition in a foreign state.

Summary of this case from City of Columbia v. Bil-Nor Construction Co.
Case details for

Doe v. Miles Inc.

Case Details

Full title:A. DOE, A SINGLE PERSON, PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, v. MILES INC.; ARMOUR…

Court:Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two

Date published: Feb 18, 1997

Citations

190 Ariz. 173 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997)
190 Ariz. 173
935 P.2d 1304

Citing Cases

Jewell v. Jewell

The legal justification for the entry of judgment has nothing to do with whether the husband had pleadings on…

Wittenberg Coal v. Compagnie Havraise Penin

The practice of defaulting defendants, who withhold evidence by refusing to answer interrogatories or…