From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dispositons of Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 1, 1999
746 A.2d 1216 (Pa. 1999)

Summary

explaining defendant's second PCRA petition was untimely, even though defendant obtained some relief pursuant to first PCRA petition; relief granted pursuant to fist petition did not affect adjudication of guilt, but only affected sentence imposed.

Summary of this case from Kefauver v. Rozum

Opinion

October 1999.


Appeal from the Superior Court

Allocatur Disposition Lower Court Docket and Appeal Docket or Title Date Number Docket Citation ___________________ _______ ________ ___________ ____________

Com. v. Brown ............ 10/4/1999 504 Denied Pa.Super., W.D. 742 A.2d 199 (1999) Com. v. Brown ............ 10/7/1999 855 Denied Pa.Super., W.D. 734 A.2d 432 (1998) Com. v. Brown ............ 10/14/1999 725 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 742 A.2d 200 (1999) Com. v. Brown ............ 10/20/1999 177 Denied Pa.Super., W.D. 736 A.2d 679 (1999) Com. v. Camp ............. 10/5/1999 303 Denied Pa.Super., W.D. 737 A.2d 1269 (1999) Com. v. Coades ........... 10/14/1999 667 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 742 A.2d 201 (1999) Com. v. Colbert .......... 10/28/1999 416 Denied Pa.Super., E.D. 742 A.2d 201 (1999) Com. v. Colon ............ 10/8/1999 185 Denied Pa.Super., E.D. 737 A.2d 803 (1999) Com. v. Cottam ........... 10/28/1999 628, 629 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 738 A.2d 1048 (1999) Com. v. Cox .............. 10/14/1999 472 Denied Pa.Super., E.D. 742 A.2d 201 (1999) Com. v. Daniels .......... 10/20/1999 704 Denied Pa.Super., E.D. 734 A.2d 433 (1998) Com. v. Daniels .......... 10/21/1999 362 Denied Pa.Super., E.D. 737 A.2d 1270 (1999) Com. v. Davis ............ 10/21/1999 386 Denied Pa.Super., W.D. 739 A.2d 584 (1999) Com. v. Dehart ........... 10/14/1999 563 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 730 A.2d 991 (1999)


Summaries of

Dispositons of Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 1, 1999
746 A.2d 1216 (Pa. 1999)

explaining defendant's second PCRA petition was untimely, even though defendant obtained some relief pursuant to first PCRA petition; relief granted pursuant to fist petition did not affect adjudication of guilt, but only affected sentence imposed.

Summary of this case from Kefauver v. Rozum
Case details for

Dispositons of Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITONS OF PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 1, 1999

Citations

746 A.2d 1216 (Pa. 1999)
746 A.2d 1216

Citing Cases

Kefauver v. Rozum

However, according to the state court, "`[A] successful first PCRA petition does not `reset the clock' for…

Com. v. Wall

We remind Wall that it is appellant's duty to "ensure that the certified record is complete for purposes of…