performing Gunwall analysis and concluding that "there is no basis to conclude Const. art. I, § 22 (amend.10) should be interpreted so as to provide more protection than the Sixth Amendment."
Summary of this case from Jones v. Washington1997.
performing Gunwall analysis and concluding that "there is no basis to conclude Const. art. I, § 22 (amend.10) should be interpreted so as to provide more protection than the Sixth Amendment."
Summary of this case from Jones v. WashingtonFull title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW[fn†
Court:The Supreme Court of Washington
Date published: Jan 1, 1997
" The trial court stated that "an affirmative duty assumed by contract may create a liability to persons not…
Williamson v. Allied Group Inc.Arne's attempts to find support in two cases where the defendants were excused from liability in part because…