Summary
holding that the forfeiture provision of section 16(b) is mandatory once a judge has been removed from office
Summary of this case from Berkhimer v. State Emps.' Ret. Bd.Opinion
1992
holding that the forfeiture provision of section 16(b) is mandatory once a judge has been removed from office
Summary of this case from Berkhimer v. State Emps.' Ret. Bd.1992
holding that the forfeiture provision of section 16(b) is mandatory once a judge has been removed from office
Summary of this case from Berkhimer v. State Emps.' Ret. Bd.Full title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
The exceptions to government immunity are required to be narrowly construed, Love v. City of Philadelphia,…
Patton v. Com. Dept. of TranspAlthough we question the finality of the April 10, 1995 order, in the interest of judicial economy, we will…