Summary
stating appellant's contention that delay damages cannot apply to future injuries lacks merit
Summary of this case from Tillery v. Children's Hosp. of Phila.Opinion
1992
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Dispositions of Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1992
530 Pa. 644 (Pa. 1992)
Summaries of
Dispositions of Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1992
530 Pa. 644 (Pa. 1992)
stating appellant's contention that delay damages cannot apply to future injuries lacks merit
Summary of this case from Tillery v. Children's Hosp. of Phila.Case details for
Dispositions of Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Case Details
Full title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
Citations
530 Pa. 644 (Pa. 1992)
Citing Cases
Weaver v. Pa. Bd. of Probation and Parole
(Citations omitted).See also Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corporation, 408 Pa. Super. 83, 596 A.2d 203 (1991),…
Tillery v. Children's Hosp. of Phila.The Roth Court further observed that "[t]he fact that the damages are for future medical expenses, i.e.…