holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion for a mistrial based on a witness' mention at trial of defendant's relationship with defendant's insurer
Summary of this case from Campbell v. McIlwain2001
holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion for a mistrial based on a witness' mention at trial of defendant's relationship with defendant's insurer
Summary of this case from Campbell v. McIlwainFull title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 2001
Rule 411 represents a narrow exception providing for the exclusion of otherwise admissible and relevant…
Whitaker v. Whitaker"An interlocutory order is one made during the pendency of an action, which does not dispose of the case, but…