From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diouf v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 28, 2010
77 A.D.3d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Summary

upholding jury award of $800,000 for future pain and suffering ($941,255.46 adjusted for inflation) to fifty-five year-old tailor who broke both wrists as the result of a slip-and-fall, requiring two surgeries and resulting in reduced range of motion, ongoing tenderness, reduced grip strength, and traumatic arthritis

Summary of this case from Cedeno v. Broan-Nutone, LLC

Opinion

No. 3517.

October 28, 2010.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul G. Feinman, J.), entered May 6, 2009, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, upon a jury verdict, awarding plaintiff $800,000 for future pain and suffering, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn (Lawrence Heisler of counsel), for appellant.

Kahn Gordon Timko Rodriques, P.C., New York (Nicholas I. Timko of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Acosta, Freedman, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, J J.


Plaintiff, a 55-year-old tailor, sustained painful fractures to both wrists after falling on uneven stairs leading into a subway station. The fracture to the left wrist was a comminuted intraarticular fracture of the distal radius and ulnar styloid, which required reduction surgery and a second surgical procedure to remove the metal hardware inserted into his wrist. Following a course of occupational therapy, plaintiffs fractures healed but he had reduced ranges of motion, tenderness and reduced grip strength, and traumatic arthritis causing pain in both wrists. Under the circumstances presented, the award for future pain and suffering did not deviate materially from what is reasonable compensation ( see Karwacki v Astoria Med. Anesthesia Assoc., E.C., 23 AD3d 438; Hayes v Normandie LLC, 306 AD2d 133, lv dismissed 100 NY2d 640; Cabezas v City of New York, 303 AD2d 307; CPLR 5501 [c]).


Summaries of

Diouf v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 28, 2010
77 A.D.3d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

upholding jury award of $800,000 for future pain and suffering ($941,255.46 adjusted for inflation) to fifty-five year-old tailor who broke both wrists as the result of a slip-and-fall, requiring two surgeries and resulting in reduced range of motion, ongoing tenderness, reduced grip strength, and traumatic arthritis

Summary of this case from Cedeno v. Broan-Nutone, LLC

In Diouf v. New York City Tr. Auth., 77 A.D.3d 600, 909 N.Y.S.2d 451 (1st Dept.2010), the 55–year–old plaintiff “sustained painful fractures to both wrists” and was required to undergo two surgeries and a course of occupational therapy, which, nevertheless, left him with “reduced ranges of motion, tenderness and reduced grip strength” (id. at 600).

Summary of this case from Cardoza v. City of N.Y.

In Diouf v. New York City Tr. Auth., 77 A.D.3d 600, 909 N.Y.S.2d 451 (1st Dept.2010), the 55–year–old plaintiff “sustained painful fractures to both wrists” and was required to undergo two surgeries and a course of occupational therapy, which, nevertheless, left him with “reduced ranges of motion, tenderness and reduced grip strength” (id. at 600).

Summary of this case from Cardoza v. City of N.Y.

In Diouf v. New York City Transit Authority, 77 A.D.3d 600 [1st Dept., 2010], a 55-year-old tailor brought a personal injury action against the transit authority.

Summary of this case from Metayer v. New York City Transit Auth.

In Diouf v. New York City Transit Authority, 77 A.D.3d 600 [1st Dept., 2010], a 55-year-old tailor brought a personal injury action against the transit authority.

Summary of this case from Metayer v. New York City Trans. Auth.
Case details for

Diouf v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:MATAR DIOUF, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 28, 2010

Citations

77 A.D.3d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7696
909 N.Y.S.2d 451

Citing Cases

Rojas v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.

When the plaintiff testified at the trial in January 2016, he still had pain in his right arm, had weakness…

Metayer v. New York City Transit Auth.

The Court found that the jury's award was excessive to the extent that the awards for past and future pain…