Summary
In Dinerman, the Supreme Court Kings County dismissed the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a)(2) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and the Second Department affirmed (id.).
Summary of this case from Palmer v. CookOpinion
No. 2008-01936.
January 20, 2009.
In an action to recover damages for negligence, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Saitta, J.), dated January 31, 2008, which granted the defendant's preanswer motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (2).
Sally Dinerman, Brooklyn, N.Y., appellant pro se.
Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany, N.Y. (Denise A. Hartman and Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Rivera, J.P., Santucci, Carni and Dickerson, JJ.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Court of Claims has exclusive jurisdiction over actions for money damages against State agencies, departments, and employees acting in their official capacity in the exercise of governmental functions ( see Morell v Balasubramanian, 70 NY2d 297, 300; Schaffer v Evans, 57 NY2d 992, 994; Sinhogar v Parry, 53 NY2d 424, 431). Consequently, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (2) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as the claims in this case arise from acts performed, and determinations made, by State employees in the course of their official duties.