From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dickerson v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Dec 6, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-cv-01363 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 6, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-cv-01363

12-06-2013

EUDELL D. DICKERSON, JR., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Petitioner's Application Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State or Federal Custody (Document 1) filed on December 8, 2010.

By Standing Order (Document 3) entered on December 8, 2010, this action was referred to the Honorable R. Clarke VanDervort, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On November 13, 2013, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 5) wherein it is recommended that this Court dismiss the Petitioner's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and remove this matter from the Court's docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by December 2, 2013.

Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the Petitioner's right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Petitioner's Application Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State or Federal Custody (Document 1) be DISMISSED and that this matter be REMOVED from the Court's docket.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge VanDervort, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.

______________________

IRENE C. BERGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA


Summaries of

Dickerson v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Dec 6, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-cv-01363 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Dickerson v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:EUDELL D. DICKERSON, JR., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION

Date published: Dec 6, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-cv-01363 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 6, 2013)

Citing Cases

Covington v. Young

report and recommendation adopted, No. CV 1:17-04612, 2018 WL 4291740 (S.D. W.Va. Sept. 6, 2018) (citing…

Cordell v. Warden

; Dickerson v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 5:10-CV-01363, 2013 WL 6388738, at *2 (S.D. W.Va. Dec.…