Summary
affirming the district court's decision to exclude testimony as being irrelevant, where the complaining party "did not make an offer of proof to show what the excluded testimony would have added" and "even if the district court [was] wrong[], the record does not show the [complaining party] was prejudiced"
Summary of this case from Hoffmann v. ClarkOpinion
No. 20-0262
10-21-2020
Matthew J. Clark of Gregory, Moore, Brooks & Clark, P.C., Detroit, Michigan, and Jay Smith of Smith & McElwain Law Office, Sioux City, for appellant. Nicole S. Facio of Newbrough Law Firm, LLP, Ames, for appellees.
DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904