From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeRaay v. DeRaay

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 31, 1939
280 N.Y. 822 (N.Y. 1939)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In DeRaay v. DeRaay (280 N.Y. 822) the facts were similar to those in the instant case, except that in that case no action had been brought against the plaintiff in a foreign State although it had been threatened. It is true that in the Appellate Division in that case the fact that no action had been instituted in the foreign jurisdiction was stressed.

Summary of this case from Goldstein v. Goldstein
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Argued May 16, 1939

Decided May 31, 1939

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Edward C. Weinrib and Kalman I. Nulman for appellant.

George J. Gross and Aaron H. Walowit for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ. Taking no part: O'BRIEN, J.

Summaries of

DeRaay v. DeRaay

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 31, 1939
280 N.Y. 822 (N.Y. 1939)

In DeRaay v. DeRaay (280 N.Y. 822) the facts were similar to those in the instant case, except that in that case no action had been brought against the plaintiff in a foreign State although it had been threatened. It is true that in the Appellate Division in that case the fact that no action had been instituted in the foreign jurisdiction was stressed.

Summary of this case from Goldstein v. Goldstein
Case details for

DeRaay v. DeRaay

Case Details

Full title:LEONA DeRAAY, Appellant, v. BERNARD DeRAAY, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 31, 1939

Citations

280 N.Y. 822 (N.Y. 1939)
21 N.E.2d 879

Citing Cases

Goldstein v. Goldstein

To the same general effect are Somberg v. Somberg ( 263 N.Y. 1) and Lowe v. Lowe ( 265 N.Y. 197). In DeRaay…

White v. White

In any event, it does not satisfactorily appear as a matter of fact that the plaintiff is about to institute…

13 Citing Cases