From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeMaestri v. Asset Acceptance Capital Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 14, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01671-WJM-MJW (D. Colo. Mar. 14, 2012)

Summary

concluding that the definition of "account" in 15 U.S.C. § 1693a does not apply to the permissible purpose provision at 15 U.S.C. § 1681b

Summary of this case from Anutani v. Diversified Consultants Inc.

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01671-WJM-MJW Consolidated with 11-cv-01672-WJM-MJW

03-14-2012

BRIAN DEMAESTRI, Plaintiff, v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE CAPITAL CORP., Defendant.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Surreply (Docket No. 35) is granted, and the court has considered plaintiff's surreply (Docket No. 35-1) when issuing its report and recommendation on the defendant's motion for summary judgment.

It is further ORDERED that the defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 39) is denied.

It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 42) is granted.


Summaries of

DeMaestri v. Asset Acceptance Capital Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 14, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01671-WJM-MJW (D. Colo. Mar. 14, 2012)

concluding that the definition of "account" in 15 U.S.C. § 1693a does not apply to the permissible purpose provision at 15 U.S.C. § 1681b

Summary of this case from Anutani v. Diversified Consultants Inc.

rejecting the plaintiff's argument that the definition of "account" in § 1681a(r) should apply to § 1681b

Summary of this case from Sheridan v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Case details for

DeMaestri v. Asset Acceptance Capital Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN DEMAESTRI, Plaintiff, v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE CAPITAL CORP., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 14, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01671-WJM-MJW (D. Colo. Mar. 14, 2012)

Citing Cases

Veal v. Portfolio Recovery, Inc.

See Searle v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc., Civ. No. 13-11914, 2014 WL 4471522, at *3-*5 (D. Mass. June 12,…

Thiessen v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC

In addition, many courts have held that the collection of a debt is a permissible purpose for seeking a…