From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deleeuw v. BD of State Canvassers

Michigan Court of Appeals
Sep 3, 2004
263 Mich. App. 496 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004)

Summary

In Deleeuw this Court also examined the board's duties regarding qualifying petitions under MCL 168.552(8), which is similar to MCL 168.476(1).

Summary of this case from Civil Rts. Initiative v. Bd. of Canvassers

Opinion


693 N.W.2d 179 (Mich.App. 2004) 263 Mich.App. 496 Nick DELEEUW, Josh Twiest, Sean Devette, and Ryan Devette, Plaintiffs, v. STATE BOARD OF CANVASSERS and Secretary of State, Defendants, and Mark Brewer, Intervenor. No. 257501. Court of Appeals of Michigan September 3, 2004

        ORDER

         Deleeuw v. Board of State Canvassers, Docket No. 257501. The Court orders that the motion for leave to file a supplemental brief is granted.

        The Court orders that the Secretary of State's motion for summary disposition of the complaint as to her is granted.

        The Court orders that the complaint for mandamus is granted. The Board of State Canvassers' sole duty with regard to qualifying petitions is to determine whether the signatures on the petition are valid, including that of the person who circulates the petition, whether they are the signatures of registered voters, and whether there are sufficient valid signatures to certify the petition. M.C.L. § 168.590f; M.C.L. § 168.552(8); Gillis v. Bd. of State Canvassers, 453 Mich. 881, 554 N.W.2d 9 (1996). Because the challenge to the petition failed to establish that there were not at least 30,000 valid signatures filed in support, the board breached its clear legal duty to certify the petition.

        Because equity regards as done that which, in good conscience, ought to have been done, Kent v. Klein, 352 Mich. 652, 656, 91 N.W.2d 11 (1958); Boden v. Renihan, 299 Mich. 226, 236, 300 N.W. 53 (1941), the Court orders that the Secretary of State is to take all necessary measures to place Ralph Nader's name on the Michigan ballot as an independent candidate for President of the United States in the November 2004 general election.

        We retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Deleeuw v. BD of State Canvassers

Michigan Court of Appeals
Sep 3, 2004
263 Mich. App. 496 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004)

In Deleeuw this Court also examined the board's duties regarding qualifying petitions under MCL 168.552(8), which is similar to MCL 168.476(1).

Summary of this case from Civil Rts. Initiative v. Bd. of Canvassers
Case details for

Deleeuw v. BD of State Canvassers

Case Details

Full title:DELEEUW v. BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 3, 2004

Citations

263 Mich. App. 496 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004)
263 Mich. App. 496
263 Mich. App. 497

Citing Cases

Delaney v. Bd. of State Canvassers

Id.; Barrow v Detroit Election Comm, 301 Mich App 404, 411; 836 NW2d 498 (2013). Michigan election law allows…

Mich. Republican Party v. Donahue

We first address plaintiffs' argument that the statutory scheme implies that the Legislature intended to…