From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delaware Valley Marine Supply v. Amer. Tobacco

U.S.
Apr 2, 1962
369 U.S. 839 (1962)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

finding no conspiracy in a conscious parallelism action in which a co-conspirator did not act contrary to its economic needs

Summary of this case from Fineman v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 734.

April 2, 1962.

Edwin P. Rome for petitioner.

R. Sturgis Ingersoll, H. Francis DeLone, C. Brewster Rhoads, Joseph W. Swain, Jr. and J. B. H. Carter for respondents.

C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Reported below: 297 F. 2d 199.

Summaries of

Delaware Valley Marine Supply v. Amer. Tobacco

U.S.
Apr 2, 1962
369 U.S. 839 (1962)

finding no conspiracy in a conscious parallelism action in which a co-conspirator did not act contrary to its economic needs

Summary of this case from Fineman v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
Case details for

Delaware Valley Marine Supply v. Amer. Tobacco

Case Details

Full title:DELAWARE VALLEY MARINE SUPPLY CO. v. AMERICAN TOBACCO CO. ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 2, 1962

Citations

369 U.S. 839 (1962)

Citing Cases

Venzie Corp. v. U.S. Mineral Prod. Co., Inc.

The Court is appropriately cautioned that it does not undertake to appraise the weight or the credibility of…

People v. Ross

In our own cases we have stated that "[t]he fact that a record shows a defendant to be guilty of a crime does…

41 Citing Cases