From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Defayette v. Superintendent, Mid-State Corr. Facility

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 19, 2008
Civil Action No. 9:05-cv-722 (GLS/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 9:05-cv-722 (GLS/DEP).

March 19, 2008

FOR THE PETITIONER: LANSING DEFAYETTE, Plaintiff Pro Se, Plattsburgh, New York.

FOR THE DEFENDANT: MALANCHA CHANDA, Assistant Attorney General, HON. ANDREW M. CUOMO, Attorney General for the State of New York, Attorney for Respondent, New York, New York.


ORDER


The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles, duly filed November 29, 2007 and resent to the petitioner on February 9, 2008 (See February 8, 2008 Text Only Order). Following ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.

No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles filed November 29, 2007 is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons state therein, and it is further

ORDERED, that the petition in this matter is DENIED and DISMISSED in all respects, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court is to enter judgment in favor of the Respondent and close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Defayette v. Superintendent, Mid-State Corr. Facility

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 19, 2008
Civil Action No. 9:05-cv-722 (GLS/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2008)
Case details for

Defayette v. Superintendent, Mid-State Corr. Facility

Case Details

Full title:LANSING DEFAYETTE, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT, MID-STATE CORRECTIONAL…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Mar 19, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 9:05-cv-722 (GLS/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2008)

Citing Cases

Lundy v. Superintendent

(“Decisions whether to engage in cross-examination, and if so to what extent and in what manner, are…

Lanza v. Lewin

]" Cobos v. Unger, 534 F. Supp. 2d 400, 403 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2008) (citing Sibron, 392 U.S. at 54-56). See…