From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Ortiz

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jun 8, 2022
Civ. 21-2174 (NLH) (D.N.J. Jun. 8, 2022)

Opinion

Civ. 21-2174 (NLH)

06-08-2022

ANTHONY DAVIS, Petitioner, v. DAVID E. ORTIZ, Respondent.

Anthony Davis 68592-054 Fort Dix Federal Correctional Institution Petitioner Pro se Philip R. Sellinger, United States Attorney Kristin Lynn Vassallo, Assistant United States Attorney Office Of the U.S. Attorney District Of New Jersey Attorneys for Respondent


Anthony Davis 68592-054 Fort Dix Federal Correctional Institution Petitioner Pro se

Philip R. Sellinger, United States Attorney Kristin Lynn Vassallo, Assistant United States Attorney Office Of the U.S. Attorney District Of New Jersey Attorneys for Respondent

OPINION

NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J.

Petitioner Anthony Davis pled guilty in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to attempt and conspiracy to commit bank fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1349, and possession of stolen mail matter, 18 U.S.C. § 1708. Judgment of Conviction, United States v. Davis, No. 13-cr-00484, (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2014) (ECF No. 80). The district court imposed a total sentence of 120-months imprisonment followed by a five years of supervised release. Id.

On February 9, 2021, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging the Bureau of Prisons' (“BOP”) refusal to apply earned time credits to his sentence under the First Step Act of 2018 (“FSA”). ECF No. 1. At the time, the BOP calculated Petitioner's projected release date to be February 15, 2023. ECF No. 1-1 at 4. The United States opposed the petition. ECF No. 4.

On January 19, 2022, the BOP finalized a new rule codifying the BOP's procedures regarding the earning and application of time credits under the FSA. FSA Time Credits, 87 FR 2705-01, codified at 28 C.F.R. § 523.40 et. seq. The Court ordered the United States to submit a supplemental brief with the effect this new rule had on Petitioner's claim, if any. ECF No. 5. Respondent filed its supplement on April 5, 2022, which included a declaration from BOP Senior CLC Attorney Christina Clark. Declaration of Christina Clark (“Clark Dec.”), ECF No. 6-1.

“The First Step Act of 2018 (FSA) provides eligible inmates the opportunity to earn 10 or 15 days of time credits for every 30 days of successful participation in Evidence Based Recidivism Reduction Programs (EBRR programs) and Productive Activities (PAs).” Id. ¶ 2 (footnotes omitted). “The earned credits, known as First Step Act Time Credits (FSA TCs), can be applied toward earlier placement in pre-release custody, such as Residential Reentry Centers (RRCs) and home confinement, or toward a term of supervised release.” Id. (citing 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(C)). “[U]nder the final rule, inmates will be assigned to EBRR programs and PAs based on an individualized risk and needs assessment. An eligible inmate may earn FSA TCs ‘for programming and activities in which he or she participated from December 21, 2018 until January 14, 2020.'” Id. ¶ 11 (citing 28 C.F.R. § 523.42(b)).

On January 9, 2022, the BOP's Designation & Sentence Computation Center recalculated and adjusted Petitioner's sentence “from a [Good Conduct Time] release date of February 15, 2023, to reflect a First Step Act release (‘FSA REL') date of February 15, 2022.” Id. ¶ 24. The BOP's inmate locator indicates that Petitioner was in fact released on February 15, 2022. Inmate Locator, available at https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/# (last visited June 6, 2022). The United States asks the Court to dismiss the § 2241 petition as moot. ECF No. 6 at 2.

Petitioner has received the relief he requested from the Court: the application of FSA credits and recalculation of his sentence. The Court cannot grant him further relief under § 2241 because the supervised release statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3624, does not permit a court to credit a supervised release term with a period of excess prison time. United States v. Johnson, 529 U.S. 53 (2000). Accord DeFoy v. McCullough, 393 F.3d 439, 442 n.3 (3d Cir. 2005) (“[T]he length of a term of supervised release cannot be reduced ‘by reason of excess time served in prison.'” (quoting Johnson)). Accordingly, the § 2241 petition is moot and will be dismissed.

An appropriate order will be entered.


Summaries of

Davis v. Ortiz

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jun 8, 2022
Civ. 21-2174 (NLH) (D.N.J. Jun. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Davis v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY DAVIS, Petitioner, v. DAVID E. ORTIZ, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jun 8, 2022

Citations

Civ. 21-2174 (NLH) (D.N.J. Jun. 8, 2022)

Citing Cases

Garcia v. Janson

Davis v. Ortiz, No. 21-cv-2174-NLH, 2022 WL 2063340, at *1 (D.N.J. June 8, 2022) (internal quotation…