From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Fulcomer

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jan 5, 1988
681 F. Supp. 137 (E.D.N.Y. 1988)

Summary

issuing conditional writ with 90-day deadline

Summary of this case from Hammond v. Conway

Opinion

No. CV-87-3531.

January 5, 1988.

Harry Davis, pro se.

John J. Santucci, Dist. Atty., Kew Gardens, N.Y. by Ivan A. Vogel, for respondents.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


On July 2, 1982 petitioner was convicted of a criminally negligent homicide. He appealed. His present appellate counsel, Steven G. Legum, Esq. was assigned to represent him on January 17, 1984.

On July 28, 1987, Mr. Legum informed petitioner that he had not yet completed the brief in the case. In his letter, he declared "I received a notice from the Appellate Division ordering me to have six particular cases ready for the September 1987 term. Unfortunately your case is not among these six." The November 16, 1987 affidavit of Ivan A. Vogel, Assistant District Attorney of Queens County, indicates that as of that time "no brief has yet been filed in this case."

These delays must be attributed to a failure on the part of the state to effectively monitor appeals. See Wheeler v. Kelly, 639 F. Supp. 1374 (E.D.N.Y. 1986); Harris v. Kuhlman, 601 F. Supp. 987 (E.D.N.Y. 1985). It should be noted that the Wheeler case also involved delays by Mr. Legum. The state has had ample notice of Mr. Legum's inadequacies. Under such circumstances, exhaustion of state remedies is not required. Id.

Unless petitioner's appeal is decided within ninety days a writ shall be granted setting aside petitioner's conviction because of an unconstitutional denial of his right to appeal. Id.

This order is stayed pending decision of an appeal from this order.

The Clerk shall send a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Clerk of the Appellate Division, Second Department, petitioner, Assistant District Attorney Ivan A. Vogel, Esq. and Steven G. Legum, Esq. at 114 Old Country Road, Mineola, New York 11501.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Davis v. Fulcomer

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jan 5, 1988
681 F. Supp. 137 (E.D.N.Y. 1988)

issuing conditional writ with 90-day deadline

Summary of this case from Hammond v. Conway
Case details for

Davis v. Fulcomer

Case Details

Full title:Harry DAVIS, Petitioner, v. Thomas A. FULCOMER, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Jan 5, 1988

Citations

681 F. Supp. 137 (E.D.N.Y. 1988)

Citing Cases

Simmons v. Reynolds

The usual disposition of a meritorious habeas petition based on a delayed appeal is to grant an alternative…

Hammond v. Conway

He is also not entitled to an order releasing him if the Appellate Division does not decide his appeal within…