Summary
discrediting opinion of examining source as being based on one-time examination while simultaneously adopting opinion of non-examining source is "particularly curious, perhaps even disingenuous"
Summary of this case from Adamson v. AstrueOpinion
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01955-REB.
December 23, 2010
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FED.R.CIV.P. 59(e)
The matter before me is Defendant's Unopposed Motion To Alter or Amend Judgment Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) [#21] filed October 8, 2010. I grant the motion.
"[#21]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.
The Commissioner asks me to amend my Order Reversing Disability Decision and Remanding to Commissioner [#19] filed September 24, 2010, and vacate the related Judgment [#20] filed September 28, 2010. The Commissioner does not challenge the determination that remand is appropriate, but simply requests that I specify that the case is remanded under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Plaintiff does not object to the relief requested.
A sentence-six remand is appropriate where new, material evidence has been adduced, and good cause exists for not having presented the evidence to the agency in a prior proceeding. See Melkonyan v. , 501 U.S. 89, 100, 111 S.Ct. 2157, 2164, 115 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991). This case was remanded to allow the Commissioner to determine whether new and material evidence would change the disability determination. ( Order Reversing Disability Decision and Remanding to Commissioner at 6 [#19] filed September 24, 2010.) Having reviewed the motion and the relevant record, I find good cause to grant the motion and vacate the judgment. See Shalala v. Schaefer , 509 U.S. 292, 297, 113 S.Ct. 2625, 2629, 125 L.Ed.2d 239 (1993) (final judgment is not entered until after the post-remand agency proceedings are complete in sentence-six remand).
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That Defendant's Unopposed Motion To Alter or Amend Judgment Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) [#21] filed October 8, 2010, is GRANTED;
2. That my Order Reversing Disability Decision and Remanding to Commissioner [#19] filed September 24, 2010, is AMENDED to direct that the Commissioner's final decision is vacated and the case remanded pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and
3. That per force the Judgment [#20] filed September 28, 2010, is VACATED.
Dated December 23, 2010, at Denver, Colorado.