From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daughtry v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Jul 12, 2012
Case No. 2:12-CV-307-FTM-99SPC (M.D. Fla. Jul. 12, 2012)

Summary

holding that personally delivering a copy of the summons, pleadings, and motions filed in the action to the defendant incarcerated at the county jail constitutes effective service under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Summary of this case from U.S. Bank Nat'Lass'N v. Sararo

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-CV-307-FTM-99SPC

07-12-2012

ROBERT A. DAUGHTRY, Plaintiff, v. RANDY L. WILLIAMS, U.S. DEPT. OF THE TREASURY- INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, and DOES 1-3, Defendants.


ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff, Robert Daughtry's ("Daughtry"), Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default against Defendant, Randy L. Williams ("Williams"), (Doc. # 12) filed on July 5, 2012. Plaintiff moves for an entry of clerk's default against Defendant Williams who is an inmate at the Charlotte County Jail, for failure to respond to the Complaint within 21 days as allowed by the Federal Rules. However, before a clerk can enter default, the court must determine whether service of process was valid. See Tyco Fire & Sec., LLC v. Alcocer, 218 F. App'x 860, 864 (11th Cir. Feb. 22, 2007). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(2), a plaintiff can effect service in any judicial district court of the United States by "delivering a copy of the summons and complaint to the individual personally."

Here, Daughtry filed a Complaint to quiet title, for partition of real property, against Williams on June 4, 2012. (Doc. # 1). The proof of service (Doc. # 3) maintains that Daughtry, acting through Youngblood Process Service, personally served Williams with a copy of the summons and Complaint on June 11, 2012, at the Charlotte County Jail. (Doc. # 3). Additionally, the Certificate of Service on Daughtry's pleadings and motions, indicate that he has served Williams with pleadings and motions filed in this case at the following address:

Randy L. Williams
Charlotte County Jail
26601 Airport Road
Punta Gorda, FL 33982
There is no indication that mail has been returned as undeliverable from this address. Therefore, because Williams was personally served with a copy of the summons and complaint, service was effective under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Now that it has been established that service was proper, the Court will evaluate the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in regard to a defendant who fails to answer a complaint. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 (a), default is justified "[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise appear by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk shall enter the party's default." Under the Federal Rules, an answer to Plaintiff's Complaint was due to be filed within 21 days. To date, Williams has not filed a responsive pleading. Thirty days have passed since Daughtry served Williams on June 11, 2012. As such, Daughtry's Motion is granted pursuant to Federal Rule 55(a). Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

Plaintiff, Robert A. Daughtry's, Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default against Randy Williams (Doc. # 11) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a clerk's default against Defendant Williams ONLY.

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 12th day of July, 2012.

______________________________

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies: All Parties of Record Randy Williams
Charlotte County Jail
26601 Airport Road
Punta Gorda, FL 33982


Summaries of

Daughtry v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Jul 12, 2012
Case No. 2:12-CV-307-FTM-99SPC (M.D. Fla. Jul. 12, 2012)

holding that personally delivering a copy of the summons, pleadings, and motions filed in the action to the defendant incarcerated at the county jail constitutes effective service under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Summary of this case from U.S. Bank Nat'Lass'N v. Sararo
Case details for

Daughtry v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT A. DAUGHTRY, Plaintiff, v. RANDY L. WILLIAMS, U.S. DEPT. OF THE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 12, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:12-CV-307-FTM-99SPC (M.D. Fla. Jul. 12, 2012)

Citing Cases

U.S. Bank Nat'Lass'N v. Sararo

Service of process therefore was properly effected under Rule 4(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.…