In Dart v. Laimbeer (107 N.Y. 664) the plaintiff's prospective share in copartnership profits for eight months was allowed to be recovered on account of the dissolution of the firm by the defendant contrary to the agreement.
Summary of this case from Stanley Trading Company, Inc. v. Bensdorp, Inc.Argued October 25, 1887
Decided November 29, 1887
Edward S. Rapallo for appellant.
George W. Wingate for respondent.
PECKHAM, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Dart v. Laimbeer (107 N.Y. 664) the plaintiff's prospective share in copartnership profits for eight months was allowed to be recovered on account of the dissolution of the firm by the defendant contrary to the agreement.
Summary of this case from Stanley Trading Company, Inc. v. Bensdorp, Inc.In Dart v. Laimbeer (107 N.Y. 669) the plaintiff proved an agreement of partnership for a year and that it was broken by the defendant after four months.
Summary of this case from Bathrick v. CoffinFull title:HENRY C. DART, Respondent, v . WILLIAM E. LAIMBEER, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Nov 29, 1887
The rule of law is not disputed, that whenever a contract between two parties has been violated by one of…
Sulzbacher v. CawthraWakeman v. Wheeler Wilson Mfg. Co., 101 N.Y. 205. There was nothing speculative about these profits; they…