From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Darden v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 16, 1998
705 So. 2d 99 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

Case No. 96-2552

Opinion Filed January 16, 1998 JANUARY TERM 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County, Charles J. Tinlin, Acting Circuit, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Susan Fagan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberta J. Tylke, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


William Darden was found guilty by a jury in May, 1996 and convicted of burglary of a dwelling, burglary of a conveyance, possession of burglary tools and felony petit theft.

Darden was not present during a sidebar conference concerning the selection of jurors. His attorney exercised two peremptory strikes and asked to dismiss one juror for cause. The record does not reflect whether Darden was consulted about any of the juror challenges or whether he acquiesced in his counsel's challenges.

We vacate the convictions because we are bound by our previous decision of August 5, 1997, in Anderson v. State, 697 So.2d 878 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), that followed Coney v. State, 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 315 (1995). In so doing, we certify conflict with the second district.

In July of this year, two panels of the second district aligned themselves with a position first asserted by Judge Altenbernd in his concurring opinion in Hill v. State, 696 So.2d 798 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), affirmed, 22 Fla. Law Weekly S561 (Fla. Sep. 11, 1997). See, Lee v. State, 695 So.2d 1314 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), rev. granted, 697 So.2d 942 (Fla. 1997); Neal v. State, 697 So.2d 941 (Fla. 2d DCA) , rev. granted, Westlaw Table, No. 91,249 (Fla. Oct. 29, 1997). The second district has declared that a Coney error cannot be raised on direct appeal without an objection having been made on the same grounds at trial. The decision in Anderson aligned this court with the first, third and fourth districts, which have expressly found that a failure to obtain a Coney waiver constitutes fundamental error.

Of the cases finding such error, the supreme court has granted review to Brower v. State, 684 So.2d 1378 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), rev. granted, 694 So.2d 739 (Fla. 1997).

We vacate the judgments and sentences and remand for a new trial.

JUDGMENTS VACATED; REMANDED.

GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

HARRIS, J., dissents, without opinion.


Summaries of

Darden v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 16, 1998
705 So. 2d 99 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Darden v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM DARDEN, JR., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 16, 1998

Citations

705 So. 2d 99 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

State v. Darden

SHAW, J. We have for review Darden v. State, 705 So.2d 99 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), based on conflict with…