From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dagnino v. Key Bank

Supreme Court of New York
Dec 8, 2021
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 6834 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2021)

Opinion

2018-12945 Index 50883/15

12-08-2021

Linda A. Dagnino, plaintiff, v. Key Bank, etc., appellant, Village of Red Hook, respondent, et al., defendant. No. 2018-12945

Smith Mazure Director Wilkins Young & Yagerman, P.C., New York, NY (Louise M. Cherkis of counsel), for appellant.


Smith Mazure Director Wilkins Young & Yagerman, P.C., New York, NY (Louise M. Cherkis of counsel), for appellant.

SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, J.P. COLLEEN D. DUFFY BETSY BARROS LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Key Bank appeals from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Edward T. McLoughlin, J.), dated October 18, 2018. The amended order denied the motion of that defendant, denominated as one for leave to reargue and renew, but which was, in actuality, one for leave to reargue that branch of its prior motion which was for summary judgment on its cross claim for contractual indemnification against the defendant Village of Red Hook, which was denied in an order of the same court dated April 12, 2018.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Although the appellant characterizes its motion as one for leave to reargue and renew, that motion was not based upon new facts and was, therefore, a motion for leave to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable (see Olson v Russell, 35 A.D.3d 684). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.

HINDS-RADIX, J.P., DUFFY, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dagnino v. Key Bank

Supreme Court of New York
Dec 8, 2021
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 6834 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2021)
Case details for

Dagnino v. Key Bank

Case Details

Full title:Linda A. Dagnino, plaintiff, v. Key Bank, etc., appellant, Village of Red…

Court:Supreme Court of New York

Date published: Dec 8, 2021

Citations

2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 6834 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2021)