From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A
Dec 12, 1956
91 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 1956)

Opinion

December 12, 1956.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Dade County; Edwin L. Jones, Judge.

Rosenhouse Rosenhouse, Miami, for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Jos. Manners, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C.J., and TERRELL, HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Curtis v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A
Dec 12, 1956
91 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 1956)
Case details for

Curtis v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:CARL C. CURTIS, APPELLANT, v. THOMAS J. KELLY, AS SHERIFF OF DADE COUNTY…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division A

Date published: Dec 12, 1956

Citations

91 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 1956)