From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Currituck Associates-Residential v. Hollowell

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 16, 2005
360 N.C. 160 (N.C. 2005)

Opinion

No. 528A04.

Filed December 16, 2005.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 166 N.C. App. 17, 601 S.E.2d 256 (2004), affirming an order entered on 22 May 2003 by Judge W. Russell Duke, Jr., in Superior Court, Dare County. Heard in the Supreme Court 20 April 2005.

Poyner Spruill LLP, by J. Nicholas Ellis, for appellee. Ragsdale Liggett PLLC, by George R. Ragsdale and Walter L. Tippett, Jr., for appellants Ray E. Hollowell, Jr. and Shallowbag Bay Development Company.


Justice MARTIN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Currituck Associates-Residential v. Hollowell

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 16, 2005
360 N.C. 160 (N.C. 2005)
Case details for

Currituck Associates-Residential v. Hollowell

Case Details

Full title:THE CURRITUCK ASSOCIATES-RESIDENTIAL PARTNERSHIP, A NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 16, 2005

Citations

360 N.C. 160 (N.C. 2005)

Citing Cases

Timber Integrated Invs., LLC v. Welch

Generally, “a settlement agreement may be enforced by filing a new action or by filing a motion in the cause,…

Robertson v. Robertson

No issue was raised as to the deficiencies of plaintiff's motion before the trial court, so we will not…