From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruceru v. Sobina

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 27, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-CV-39 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 27, 2009)

Summary

adopting Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation and denying habeas relief

Summary of this case from Hurley v. Thompson

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-CV-39.

October 27, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2009, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart and the Petitioner's objections thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Cruceru v. Sobina

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 27, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-CV-39 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 27, 2009)

adopting Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation and denying habeas relief

Summary of this case from Hurley v. Thompson
Case details for

Cruceru v. Sobina

Case Details

Full title:TRAIAN CRUCERU v. RAYMOND SOBINA, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 27, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-CV-39 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 27, 2009)

Citing Cases

Hurley v. Thompson

It is true that a "child victim's testimony alone—if credited by the jury, which it apparently was—[i]s…