From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crockwell v. Austin

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Mar 28, 2024
Civil Action 22-1649 (BAH) (D.D.C. Mar. 28, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-1649 (BAH)

03-28-2024

ERIN CROCKWELL, Plaintiff, v. LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Defense, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

BERYL A. HOWELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Upon consideration of defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 21, plaintiff's Corrected Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 27, the memoranda submitted in support and opposition thereto, the Joint Appendix of Relevant Portions of the Certified Administrative Record, ECF No. 31, and the entire record herein, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby:

ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 21, is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiff's Corrected Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 27, is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that this matter be remanded to the Physical Disability Board of Review for further consideration consistent with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close this case.

SO ORDERED.

This is a final and appealable order.


Summaries of

Crockwell v. Austin

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Mar 28, 2024
Civil Action 22-1649 (BAH) (D.D.C. Mar. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Crockwell v. Austin

Case Details

Full title:ERIN CROCKWELL, Plaintiff, v. LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III in his official…

Court:United States District Court, District of Columbia

Date published: Mar 28, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 22-1649 (BAH) (D.D.C. Mar. 28, 2024)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Austin

The PDBR's review “shall be based on the records of the armed force concerned and such other evidence”…