In Correa v. State, 940 A.2d 945 (Table), 2007 WL 4110622 (Del. Nov. 20, 2007), the Delaware Supreme Court refused the review the merits of the claim because the Rule 35(b) motion was repetitive.
Summary of this case from Correa v. PhelpsNo. 301, 2007.
November 20, 2007.
Appeal from the Superior (Kent) Cr 0205013182.
Decisions Without Published Opinions AFFIRMED.
In Correa v. State, 940 A.2d 945 (Table), 2007 WL 4110622 (Del. Nov. 20, 2007), the Delaware Supreme Court refused the review the merits of the claim because the Rule 35(b) motion was repetitive.
Summary of this case from Correa v. PhelpsFull title:Correa v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Nov 20, 2007
The Superior Court denied the Rule 35(b) motion as repetitive, and the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed that…
Evans v. Piercener's Rule 35(b) motion as both repetitive and untimely filed was consistent with other Delaware Supreme…