From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conner v. Hill

U.S.
Mar 22, 2004
541 U.S. 946 (2004)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Conner v. Hill Co., 6 La. Ann. 7, under the special circumstances recited in the body of the opinion, which are not similar to those in the present case, the court thought that it would be contrary to good conscience to permit plaintiff to recover, and the case, whatever may be thought of its correctness, turned chiefly upon that point.

Summary of this case from Freeport Tampico Fuel Oil Corporation v. Lange
See 1 Summary

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

No. 03-8462.

March 22, 2004.

C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Summaries of

Conner v. Hill

U.S.
Mar 22, 2004
541 U.S. 946 (2004)

In Conner v. Hill Co., 6 La. Ann. 7, under the special circumstances recited in the body of the opinion, which are not similar to those in the present case, the court thought that it would be contrary to good conscience to permit plaintiff to recover, and the case, whatever may be thought of its correctness, turned chiefly upon that point.

Summary of this case from Freeport Tampico Fuel Oil Corporation v. Lange
Case details for

Conner v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:CONNER v. HILL, SUPERINTENDENT, SNAKE RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 22, 2004

Citations

541 U.S. 946 (2004)

Citing Cases

Tripp v. Martin

Prior to the adoption of the constitution of 1945, it was held by this court that the authority to employ…

Freeport Tampico Fuel Oil Corporation v. Lange

Hence, the case falls within an exception to the rule mentioned above. In Conner v. Hill Co., 6 La. Ann. 7,…

3 Citing Cases