From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Quick

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 21, 2013
91 A.3d 1292 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013)

Summary

noting that because Quick was 20 years at the time of the murder, Miller v. Alabama, 132 S.Ct. 2455 (holding unconstitutional mandatory sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for defendants under the age of 18 at the time of their crimes) would not apply to satisfy the newly recognized constitutional right exception, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Quick

Opinion

NO. 514 MDA 2013

2013-11-21

Com. v. H. Quick


Appeal From: CP–14–CR–0002037–1999 (Centre)

Disposition: Affirmed.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Quick

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 21, 2013
91 A.3d 1292 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013)

noting that because Quick was 20 years at the time of the murder, Miller v. Alabama, 132 S.Ct. 2455 (holding unconstitutional mandatory sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for defendants under the age of 18 at the time of their crimes) would not apply to satisfy the newly recognized constitutional right exception, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Quick
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Quick

Case Details

Full title:Com. v. H. Quick

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Nov 21, 2013

Citations

91 A.3d 1292 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Quick

On February 26, 2013, the PCRA court dismissed the petition as untimely, and this Court affirmed.…