From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Niditch

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Mar 20, 2008
883 N.E.2d 341 (Mass. App. Ct. 2008)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

noting that defendant's “perfunctory” motion to revise or revoke, filed on January 6, 1998, was improper because it was not “accompanied by an affidavit, [and did not] otherwise indicate the grounds on which it [was] based”

Summary of this case from Holmes v. Spencer
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 07-P-95.

March 20, 2008.

Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28.

Order entered December 14, 2006, denying motion to revise or revoke sentence affirmed.

Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Niditch

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Mar 20, 2008
883 N.E.2d 341 (Mass. App. Ct. 2008)

noting that defendant's “perfunctory” motion to revise or revoke, filed on January 6, 1998, was improper because it was not “accompanied by an affidavit, [and did not] otherwise indicate the grounds on which it [was] based”

Summary of this case from Holmes v. Spencer
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Niditch

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH v. WILLIAM NIDITCH

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Mar 20, 2008

Citations

883 N.E.2d 341 (Mass. App. Ct. 2008)
71 Mass. App. Ct. 1114

Citing Cases

Holmes v. Spencer

We sympathize somewhat with Holmes's argument that applying DeJesús retroactively would be unfair.…

1 Citing Cases