From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 3, 1975
344 A.2d 460 (Pa. 1975)

Summary

In Edwards, the evidentiary use at trial of the defendant's inculpatory statement was asserted as error and in violation of the Futch rule because of the lapse of five hours between the time of arrest and the giving of the inculpatory statement.

Summary of this case from Commonwealth of Pa. v. Coley

Opinion

Argued November 21, 1974.

Decided October 3, 1975.

Appeal Nos. 517, 566 January Term, 1974, from the Judgment of Sentence of the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Trial Division, Criminal Section, imposed on Indictments Nos. 568-569 March Sessions, 1973; Joseph C. Bruno, Judge.

Malcolm W. Berkowitz, Philadelphia, for appellant.

F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Dist. Atty., Richard A. Sprague, 1st Asst. Dist. Atty., Steven H. Goldblatt, Asst. Dist. Atty., Chief, Appeals Division, Maxine J. Stotland, Asst. Dist. Atty., Mark Sendrow, Asst. Dist. Atty., Assistant Chief, Appeals Division, Abraham J. Gafni, Deputy Dist. Atty. for Law, for appellee.

Before JONES, C. J., and EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ.


OPINION OF THE COURT


Judgment of sentence affirmed.

POMEROY, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 3, 1975
344 A.2d 460 (Pa. 1975)

In Edwards, the evidentiary use at trial of the defendant's inculpatory statement was asserted as error and in violation of the Futch rule because of the lapse of five hours between the time of arrest and the giving of the inculpatory statement.

Summary of this case from Commonwealth of Pa. v. Coley
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Edwards

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Robert EDWARDS, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 3, 1975

Citations

344 A.2d 460 (Pa. 1975)
344 A.2d 460

Citing Cases

Commonwealth of Pa. v. Coley

Thus, because the period of time is so short and because Coley agreed to be questioned, we do not think this…