From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com v. Baker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 30, 2015
134 A.3d 506 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015)

Summary

rejecting Appellant's claims that his plea was involuntary because a limited mental capacity prohibited him from understanding the charges against him and counsel had failed to share discovery materials with him prior to the plea

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Baker

Opinion

NO. 476 MDA 2015

11-30-2015

Com. v. S. Baker, Jr.


Opinion

Disposition: Affirmed.


Summaries of

Com v. Baker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 30, 2015
134 A.3d 506 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015)

rejecting Appellant's claims that his plea was involuntary because a limited mental capacity prohibited him from understanding the charges against him and counsel had failed to share discovery materials with him prior to the plea

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Baker
Case details for

Com v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:Com. v. S. Baker, Jr.

Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Nov 30, 2015

Citations

134 A.3d 506 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Baker

However, that appeal also failed to garner Appellant relief. See Commonwealth v. Baker, 134 A.3d 506…

Commonwealth v. Baker

However, that appeal also failed to garner Appellant relief. See Commonwealth v. Baker , 134 A.3d 506…