From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 19, 1981
648 F.2d 922 (3d Cir. 1981)

Summary

finding that proof of gross statistical disparities, nonstatistical proof showing specifically enumerated departures from hiring hall practices, and testimony of minority individuals regarding their attempts to seek access to hiring hall may create or corroborate inference of employment discrimination

Summary of this case from Attenborough v. Const. and General Bldg. Laborers' Local 79

Opinion

Nos. 80-2159, 80-2160.

Argued February 24, 1981. Reargued In Banc May 12, 1981.

Decided May 19, 1981.

Marvin I. Barish and Gordon Gelfond (argued), Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants Local Union 542 and Operating Engineers Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee.

John J. McAleese, Jr., Thomas J. McGoldrick (argued), D. Richard Powell, Jr., Luis A. Minella, Cuniff, Bray McAleese, Bala Cynwyd, Pa., for appellants Operating Engineers Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee.

Harold I. Goodman (argued) and Germaine Ingram, Community Legal Services, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa., for Individually Named and Class Appellees.

Joel M. Ressler, Louis J. Rovelli, Margaret Hunting, Deputy Attys. Gen., LeRoy S. Zimmerman, Atty. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Harrisburg, Pa., for appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Louis C. Bechtle, J.

Before WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges, and MILLER, Judge, Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

The Honorable Jack R. Miller, United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, Washington, D.C., sitting by designation.

Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, ALDISERT, GIBBONS, HUNTER, WEIS, and GARTH, Circuit Judges.


Argued Feb. 24, 1981.


Reargued May 12, 1981 In Banc.


OPINION OF THE COURT


Essentially for the reasons set forth in the opinions of the district court, see Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, 469 F. Supp. 329 (E.D.Pa. 1978); 488 F. Supp. 988 (E.D.Pa. 1979); 502 F. Supp. 7 (E.D.Pa. 1979), and to the extent that the judgment of the district court is challenged by these appeals, the judgment of the district court will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 19, 1981
648 F.2d 922 (3d Cir. 1981)

finding that proof of gross statistical disparities, nonstatistical proof showing specifically enumerated departures from hiring hall practices, and testimony of minority individuals regarding their attempts to seek access to hiring hall may create or corroborate inference of employment discrimination

Summary of this case from Attenborough v. Const. and General Bldg. Laborers' Local 79
Case details for

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA AND RAYMOND WILLIAMS, WILLIE McKAY, MARION J…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: May 19, 1981

Citations

648 F.2d 922 (3d Cir. 1981)

Citing Cases

Com. of Pa. v. Local Union 542, Intern. Union

The district court in 1978 found Local 542 liable for intentional, classwide discrimination against minority…

Coble v. Hot Springs School Dist. No. 6

Rather, defendant, in his rebuttal presentation, must either rework plaintiff's statistics incorporating the…