In Com. v. Hussey, 157 Mass. 415, 32 N.E. 362, it was held that, as the essential features of carnal knowledge are the same in prosecutions for adultery as in prosecutions for rape, emission need not be proved.
Summary of this case from State v. Warner1701 EDA 2016
03-20-2017
COM. v. HUSSEY, J.
Affirmed
In Com. v. Hussey, 157 Mass. 415, 32 N.E. 362, it was held that, as the essential features of carnal knowledge are the same in prosecutions for adultery as in prosecutions for rape, emission need not be proved.
Summary of this case from State v. WarnerFull title:COM. v. HUSSEY, J.
Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Date published: Mar 20, 2017
The court disapproved the holding in the case of Noble v. State, 22 Ohio St. 541, that "emissio seminis is an…
State v. MurphyUnder the circumstances of this case, as shown conclusively by the evidence, no demand was necessary. It…