Summary Disposition.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals erred in affirming the Oakland Circuit Court's application of a "due process" analysis in its April 24, 2008, order awarding the plaintiffs' attorney fees, costs and disbursements pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, MCL 15.231, et seq. ("FOLA"). MCL 15.240(6) provides that courts shall award reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and disbursements to prevailing FOLA plaintiffs. In determining the reasonable attorney fees due to the plaintiffs, the circuit court considered whether the city's conduct was "corrupt enough" to justify a, sanction that "amounts to a severe criminal penalty," and whether the requested attorney fees would bankrupt the city or whether a sanction would "burden . . . the public welfare." Nothing in MCL 15.240(6), or decisions of this Court, authorizes consideration of such factors in determining a reasonable attorney fee award. For the same reason, the Court of Appeals clearly erred in analyzing whether the documents were substantively useful to the plaintiffs' case. We remand this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for a re-determination of the plaintiffs' reasonable attorney fees pursuant to the factors set forth in Smith v Khouri, 481 Mich 519 (2008). In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. Court of Appeals No. 285431.