Summary
adopting the parties' consent-to-discipline agreement and imposing a stayed nine-month suspension on an attorney who neglected a client's matter, voluntarily dismissed that client's case without her knowledge, and failed to advise another client that he did not maintain malpractice insurance; mitigating factors included the absence of prior discipline, lack of a dishonest motive, and cooperation in the disciplinary process
Summary of this case from Columbus Bar Ass'n v. LafayetteOpinion
No. 2010-0254.
June 9, 2010.
On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 09-066. David C. Sherman, Attorney Registration No. 0031000, is suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for nine months, stayed on condition.
MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS
Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Brown, C.J., not participating.