From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clegg v. Gould

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
May 27, 1942
314 Ill. App. 670 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)

Summary

In Clegg v. Gould, 314 Ill. App. 670, 42 N.E.2d 315, the court held that a contention that plaintiff failed to attach to his complaint a copy of the written contract upon which the action was based, not having been raised in the trial court, cannot be urged on appeal.

Summary of this case from Senese v. City of Chicago

Opinion

Gen. No. 41,907. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed May 27, 1942

SAVING QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW, § 1necessity of raising questions in trial court. Where plaintiff's claim against two defendants for money loaned was joint and several and only one defendant was served with summons, objections to the complaint not made in the trial court by the one served, or to the entry of judgment against both defendants when only one was served, not objected to in the trial court, would not be considered on review.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Circuit Court of Cook county; Hon. GEORGE W. BRISTOW, presiding.

Judgment affirmed. Heard in this court at February term, 1942.

George R. Gould, pro se;

George Panea, of counsel;

Thompson, Chambers Thompson, for appellee;

Percival E. Thompson, of counsel.


"Not to be published In full." Opinion filed May 27, 1942.


Summaries of

Clegg v. Gould

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
May 27, 1942
314 Ill. App. 670 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)

In Clegg v. Gould, 314 Ill. App. 670, 42 N.E.2d 315, the court held that a contention that plaintiff failed to attach to his complaint a copy of the written contract upon which the action was based, not having been raised in the trial court, cannot be urged on appeal.

Summary of this case from Senese v. City of Chicago
Case details for

Clegg v. Gould

Case Details

Full title:John T. Clegg, Appellee, v. George R. Gould and G. M. Fuller, Defendants…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: May 27, 1942

Citations

314 Ill. App. 670 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
42 N.E.2d 315

Citing Cases

Swiontek v. Greenstein

However, the defendant attempts to raise new matter in this appeal by asserting that the identity of the two…

Senese v. City of Chicago

On appeal one of defendants' theories of the case is that plaintiffs' amended complaint fails to state a…