Summary
dismissing appeal from Family Court Commissioner's order for lack of jurisdiction
Summary of this case from Shaw v. Div. of Child Support Servs.Opinion
6 2023
02-07-2023
PHOEBE CLARK,[1] Petitioner Below, Appellant, v. BELLA COOK, Respondent Below, Appellee.
Submitted: January 17, 2023
Court Below-Family Court of the State of Delaware File No. CS17-02841 Petition No. 22-24835
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.
ORDER
Karen L. Valihura Justice
After consideration of the notice to show cause and the response, it appears to the Court that:
(1) On January 6, 2023, the petitioner below-appellant, Phoebe Clark, filed this appeal from a Family Court Commissioner's order, dated December 13, 2022, denying her motion to rescind a protection from abuse order. The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Clark to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for this Court's lack of jurisdiction to consider an appeal directly from a Family Court Commissioner's order.
(2) In her response to the notice to show cause, Clark challenges the issuance of the underlying protection from abuse order that was entered by default in October 2019. She does not address this Court's lack of jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from a Family Court Commissioner's order.
(3) Under 10 Del. C. § 915(d) and Family Court Civil Rules 53.1(a), a party's right to appeal from a Commissioner's order is to a judge of the Family Court. This Court lacks jurisdiction to lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal directly from a Family Court Commissioner's order. This appeal must therefore be dismissed.
10 Del. C. § 915(d)(1), (2) (governing appeals from final and interim orders issued by commissioners); Fam. Ct. Civ. R. 53.1(a) ("An interim or final order of a commissioner may be appealed to a judge of the [Family] Court....").
See, e.g., Wilson v. Div. of Child Support Servs./Ridgeway, 2021 WL 5028375, at *1 (Del. Oct. 28, 2021) (dismissing appeal from Family Court Commissioner's order for lack of jurisdiction); Wright v. DCSE, 2009 WL 1847743, at *1 (Del. June 29, 2009) (same).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.