From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Owosso v. Pouillon

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 25, 2001
465 Mich. 877 (Mich. 2001)

Opinion

No. 118172.

September 25, 2001.


COA: 222098, Shiawassee CC: 96-007653-AR

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the November 9, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. On remand, there is no need to address the defendant's challenge to the ordinance under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000-bb, because the Supreme Court has held the provision was beyond Congress' enforcement powers under § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment in City of Boerne v Flores, 521 U.S. 507; 117 S.Ct. 2157; 138 L.Ed.2d 264 (1997). See Gentala v City of Tucson, 244 F.3d 1065, 1070 n9 (CA 9, 2001).


Summaries of

City of Owosso v. Pouillon

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 25, 2001
465 Mich. 877 (Mich. 2001)
Case details for

City of Owosso v. Pouillon

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF OWOSSO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAMES POUILLON…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Sep 25, 2001

Citations

465 Mich. 877 (Mich. 2001)
636 N.W.2d 136

Citing Cases

People of City of Owosso v. Pouillon

Subsequently, in lieu of granting leave to appeal, our Supreme Court remanded the case to this Court for…