From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chisholm v. Cofer

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 3, 1994
264 Ga. 512 (Ga. 1994)

Summary

In Chisholm v. Cofer, 264 Ga. 512 (448 SE2d 369) (1994), we held that a magistrate judge has discretion to determine whether or not probable cause exists for the issuance of an arrest warrant and that mandamus will not lie to compel the magistrate judge to perform this discretionary act unless a gross abuse of discretion has been shown.

Summary of this case from Uzomba v. Cobb County Magistrate Court

Opinion

S94A1039.

DECIDED OCTOBER 3, 1994.

Mandamus. McDuffie Superior Court. Before Judge Stevens.

Hugh S. Chisholm, Sr., pro se. Dunaway Wallace, Roger W. Dunaway, Jr., for appellee.


Chisholm presented a pro se petition for writ of mandamus and affidavit of indigency, asking the superior court to compel a magistrate to issue an arrest warrant against an individual for false swearing in a notary public application. He appeals from an order denying the filing of the writ of mandamus for failure to state a claim for relief. See OCGA § 9-15-2 (d).

A magistrate has discretion to determine whether or not probable cause exists for the issuance of an arrest warrant based on his own knowledge or on the information of others given to him under oath. OCGA § 17-4-40. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy which will not issue to compel a public officer to perform a discretionary act, unless a gross abuse of such discretion has been shown. OCGA § 9-6-21 (a); Jersawitz v. Bodiford, 258 Ga. 829 ( 377 S.E.2d 502) (1989); Clear Vision CATV v. Mayor of Jesup, 225 Ga. 757 ( 171 S.E.2d 505) (1969). The magistrate court exercised its discretion in refusing to issue the arrest warrant. No abuse of that discretion has been shown. Since the writ of mandamus does not lie, it was not error to deny its filing.

Cofer's motion for frivolous appeal penalty is denied.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.


DECIDED OCTOBER 3, 1994.


Summaries of

Chisholm v. Cofer

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 3, 1994
264 Ga. 512 (Ga. 1994)

In Chisholm v. Cofer, 264 Ga. 512 (448 SE2d 369) (1994), we held that a magistrate judge has discretion to determine whether or not probable cause exists for the issuance of an arrest warrant and that mandamus will not lie to compel the magistrate judge to perform this discretionary act unless a gross abuse of discretion has been shown.

Summary of this case from Uzomba v. Cobb County Magistrate Court
Case details for

Chisholm v. Cofer

Case Details

Full title:CHISHOLM v. COFER

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Oct 3, 1994

Citations

264 Ga. 512 (Ga. 1994)
448 S.E.2d 369

Citing Cases

Yizar v. Ault

1. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy which will not issue to compel a public officer to perform a…

Vargas v. Morris

We conclude that the parole guidelines system clearly expresses the fact that the board exercises its…