From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chanel Inc. v. Zhang Yang

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 21, 2013
No. C 12-4428 PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2013)

Summary

advertising and offering for sale counterfeit and infringing products on website satisfies intentional act requirement

Summary of this case from Avaya Inc. v. Pearce

Opinion

No. C 12-4428 PJH

2013-10-21

CHANEL INC., Plaintiff, v. ZHANG YANG, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

The court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Ryu's Report and Recommendation Re: Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment, filed in this case on August 13, 2013. Defendant did not file an objection within the time allowed under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The court finds the report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for default judgment is GRANTED. Judgment will be entered in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $105,000 in statutory damages and $350 in costs, as well as postjudgment interest. Additionally, the court enters a permanent injunction as set forth in the separate judgment.

Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order (along with the accompanying judgment) upon defendant and file a proof of service with the court by October 25, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Chanel Inc. v. Zhang Yang

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 21, 2013
No. C 12-4428 PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2013)

advertising and offering for sale counterfeit and infringing products on website satisfies intentional act requirement

Summary of this case from Avaya Inc. v. Pearce

awarding $3,000 for each of 35 infringements of Chanel's mark, for a total award of $105,000

Summary of this case from Trentadue v. Lamonte,
Case details for

Chanel Inc. v. Zhang Yang

Case Details

Full title:CHANEL INC., Plaintiff, v. ZHANG YANG, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 21, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-4428 PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2013)

Citing Cases

Trentadue v. Lamonte,

For these reasons, an award greater than the minimum statutory damage award is justified.SeeBMG Music v.…

St Andrews Links Ltd. v. Source & Design Int'l Uk Ltd

St Andrews' citation to a single case in this district that supports its position does not persuade this…