From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Apr 15, 2002
535 U.S. 1004 (2002)

Summary

noting that under the plain error doctrine, reversal is appropriate only where the trial court's error is "clear, prejudicial, and affects substantial rights"

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Bitterman

Opinion

APRIL 15, 2002


No. 01-8789 PEREZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-8790 HUTCHINS v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 281 F.3d 1278.

No. 01-8792 GRAHAM v. UNITED STATES. Ct. App.D.C. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 794 A.2d 634.

No. 01-8795 WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 16 Fed. Appx. 510.

No. 01-8797 WHITNEY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. Armed Forces. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 55 M.J. 413.

No. 01-8799 FINNEY v. UNITED STATES. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 281 F.3d 225.

No. 01-8801 BROWN v. LITSCHER, SECRETARY WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-8802 SMITH v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 15 Fed. Appx. 182.

No. 01-8804 SANDERSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 23 Fed. Appx. 150.

No. 01-8807 NUNEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 31 Fed. Appx. 151.

No. 01-8812 SOTO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 269 F.3d 761.

No. 01-8814 LACHNER v. OHIO. Ct. App. Ohio, Sandusky County. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-8817 CALLAN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 22 Fed. Appx. 434.

No. 01-8818 LICHTMAN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 29 Fed. Appx. 573.

No. 01-8823 ABDULLAH v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 29 Fed. Appx. 572.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Apr 15, 2002
535 U.S. 1004 (2002)

noting that under the plain error doctrine, reversal is appropriate only where the trial court's error is "clear, prejudicial, and affects substantial rights"

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Bitterman
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 15, 2002

Citations

535 U.S. 1004 (2002)

Citing Cases

Williams v. U.S.

Williams petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, which was denied on April 15,…

U.S. v. Bitterman

The alleged error must have been of such gravity as to affect the "substantial rights" of a party, thus…