From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jan 22, 2001
531 U.S. 1131 (2001)

Summary

holding that "once a matter has been decided adversely to a defendant on direct appeal it cannot be relitigated in a collateral attack under section 2255."

Summary of this case from Cummings v. U.S.

Opinion

JANUARY 22, 2001


00-7458. JACKSON v. UNITED STATES. Ct. App.D.C. Certiorari denied.

00-7462. GUERRA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-7468. DE LA CRUZ v. LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 233 F.3d 574.

00-7497. CARTER, AKA DEAN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-7499. MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES. Ct. App.D.C. Certiorari denied.

00-7500. NYHUIS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 F.3d 1340.

00-7501. RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 229 F.3d 1154.

00-7503. WHITT v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 230 F.3d 1356.

00-7504. WEBB v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 218 F.3d 877.

00-7506. PETERSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 225 F, 3d 1167.

00-7507. GREEN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 225 F.3d 955.

00-7510. CRANDON v. UNITED STATES. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 234 F.3d 1266.

00-7512. ARNULFO ZUNIGA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 212 F.3d 1194.

00-7515. MCCULLOUGH v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 229 F.3d 1160.

00-7516. CONSOLVO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 230 F.Sd 1354.

00-7527. QUEENSBOROUGH v. UNITED STATES. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 227 F.3d 149.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jan 22, 2001
531 U.S. 1131 (2001)

holding that "once a matter has been decided adversely to a defendant on direct appeal it cannot be relitigated in a collateral attack under section 2255."

Summary of this case from Cummings v. U.S.

concluding "that the district court has jurisdiction over this civil forfeiture action despite the fact that [defendant's] aircraft never was brought within the geographical boundaries of the district"

Summary of this case from U.S. v. One 2001 BMW X5 Vehicle

stating that "[n]othing in section 4A1.3, the provision under which the district court shifted [the defendant] into a lower criminal history category, indicates that a category change under this provision deletes previously assessed criminal history points for the purposes of the section 5C1.2 analysis."

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Jordan

stating that "[n]othing in section 4A1.3, the provision under which the district court shifted [the defendant] into a lower criminal history category, indicates that a category change under this provision deletes previously assessed criminal history points for the purposes of the section 5C1.2 analysis."

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Stevens
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 22, 2001

Citations

531 U.S. 1131 (2001)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Diemer

See United States v. Cordoba-Mosquera, 212 F.3d 1194, 1196 (11th Cir. 2000), cert. denied sub nom. Zuniga v.…

U.S. v. Wyman

When the appellate court has reviewed a case on the merits, as it has done here, and held that there was…