From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 6, 2000
531 U.S. 979 (2000)

Summary

reversing jury verdict and holding that defendant's discount programs were not exclusive dealing contracts when prices remained above cost and rivals could "lure customers away by offering superior discounts"

Summary of this case from NATCHITOCHES PAR. HOSP. SVC DIST. v. TYCO INT., LTD.

Opinion

NOVEMBER 6, 2000


00-339 KELLY ET AL. v. AL FURAT PETROLEUM CO. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 841.

00-342 TAIWAN ET AL. v. TEI YAN SUN ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 201 F.3d 1105.

00-348 ADVANCE LEASING DEVELOPMENT, INC., ET AL. v. HART ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 216 F.3d 1090.

00-352 MAURINO v. JOHNSON, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 210 F.3d 638.

00-365 AHEART v. SODEXHO MARRIOTT SERVICES, INC. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below:

00-367 DARIA v. LINDSEY, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 215 F.3d 1332

00-373 COMMANDER OIL CORP. ET AL. v. BARLO EQUIPMENT CORP. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 215 F.3d 321

00-379 CONCORD BOAT CORP., ET AL. v. BRUNSWICK CORP. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 207 F.3d 1039.

00-382 WILLMAR ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. v. COOKE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 212 F.3d 533.

00-383 BEY v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 647.

00-389 GRANITI v. BUENA VISTA HOME VIDEO, INC., ET AL. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

00-390 HEIRS OF GUERRA, DECEASED v. UNITED STATES, ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 207 F.3d 763.

00-395 GAYLOR v. WEST VIRGINIA. Sup.Ct. App. W. Va. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 6, 2000
531 U.S. 979 (2000)

reversing jury verdict and holding that defendant's discount programs were not exclusive dealing contracts when prices remained above cost and rivals could "lure customers away by offering superior discounts"

Summary of this case from NATCHITOCHES PAR. HOSP. SVC DIST. v. TYCO INT., LTD.

rejecting plaintiff's argument that trial court was authorized to exercise specific jurisdiction based on defendant's execution of a contract with a Texas company to provide services in Texas, "because claims do not arise out of those contacts" but "out of alleged tortious acts committed . . . in Syria"

Summary of this case from Equitable Production Co. v. Canales-Treviño

permitting amendment of answer to assert additional affirmative defense after a seven-year delay does not constitute an abuse of discretion in the absence of prejudice

Summary of this case from Colida v. Nokia America Corporation

applying substantial foreclosure test to manufacturer's discount programs tied to volume purchases

Summary of this case from R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Philip Morris, Inc.

permitting amendment of answer to assert additional affirmative defense after a seven-year delay does not constitute an abuse of discretion in the absence of prejudice

Summary of this case from A.I.A. Holdings, S.A. v. Lehman Brothers, Inc.
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 6, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 979 (2000)

Citing Cases

Price Trucking Corp. v. Norampac Indus., Inc.

But while CERCLA obviously is designed to facilitate cost recovery, it does so through the assignment of…

Evans v. Pemex

Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp., 488 U.S. 428, 434 n. 3 (1989); see also Verlinden B.V. v.…