From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jan 7, 2002
534 U.S. 1097 (2002)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding that Apprendi did not announce a watershed rule of criminal procedure

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Hammond
See 5 Summaries

Opinion

JANUARY 7, 2002

No. 01-7138. ALFARO-ROJAS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 2 Fed. Appx. 794.

No. 01-7140. MOSS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 252 F.3d 993.

No. 01-7141. MEDINA-GARCIA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 273 F.3d 1103.

No. 01-7145. COMPEAN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 273 F.3d 1094.

No. 01-7148. TULIO CANTILLANO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 273 F.3d 1101.

No. 01-7150. OJEDA-GUERRERO v. UNITED STATES; CRUZ-ISLAS v. UNITED STATES; MUNOZ-FERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES; MARTINEZ-WATSON v. UNITED STATES; and ORLANDO BENTEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 273 F.3d 1099 (first and second judgments) 1102 (third and fourth judgments), and 1103 (fifth judgment).

No. 01-7151. ISRAEL MUNOZ v. UNITED STATES; CHAVEZ v. UNITED STATES; FELIX-DUENAS, AKA ACUNA-DUENAS v. UNITED STATES; GUITRON-REYEGOSA v. UNITED STATES; HERNANDEZ-PEREZ v. UNITED STATES; MOLINA-VALENZUELA, AKA GUSTAVO, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES; MORA v. UNITED STATES; OJEDA-AGUNDEZ v. UNITED STATES (Reported below; 18 Fed. Appx. 533); RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES; SALINAS-SERVIN v. UNITED STATES; and VALENZUELA-HOLGUIN, AKA VALENZUELA, AKA DOE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7155. MENDOZA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 16 Fed. Appx. 770.

No. 01-7157. MACKEY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 265 F.3d 457.

No. 01-7159. MARTINEZ-LOZANO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 273 F.3d 1100.

No. 01-7162. BRUNSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 16 Fed. Appx. 727.

No. 01-7163. BOJORQUEZ-BRACAMONTES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 14 Fed. Appx. 991.

534 U.S. 1077

Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jan 7, 2002
534 U.S. 1097 (2002)

holding that Apprendi did not announce a watershed rule of criminal procedure

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Hammond

noting that first exception is not relevant in this type of case

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Sanchez-Cervantes

Regarding an Apprendi claim that was not presented on direct appeal, affirming denial of 2255 motion and stating that "relief [pursuant to section 2255] is an extraordinary remedy which `will not be allowed to do service for an appeal,'" and specifying that a "claim unraised on direct appeal is procedurally defaulted unless a petitioner can demonstrate cause for the default and actual prejudice or actual innocence."

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Park

relying on the Teague bar

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Perez

relying on the Teague bar

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Perez
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 7, 2002

Citations

534 U.S. 1097 (2002)
122 S. Ct. 848

Citing Cases

Hines v. State

In so holding, this court has relied on federal cases, concluding thatApprendi did not create a new…

Windom v. State

See Sepulveda v. United States, 330 F.3d 55, 60 (1st Cir. 2003); Coleman v. United States, 329 F.3d 77, 90…

79 Citing Cases