Summary
holding absent an express provision in a treaty, exclusion of evidence is not an appropriate remedy
Summary of this case from State v. PrasertphongOpinion
JUNE 29, 2001
No. 00-10272. DENNIS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-10276. HODGES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 4 Fed.Appx. 497.
No. 00-10282. WOOTEN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 253 F.3d 700.
No. 00-10285. BLAKE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 1208.
No. 00-10289. WILSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 244 F.3d 1208.
No. 00-10290. WILSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 246 F.3d 671.
No. 00-10297. HURON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 246 F.3d 669.
No. 00-10298. JIMENEZ-NAVA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 243 F.3d 192.
No. 00-10299. GRIFFIN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 1153.
No. 00-10303. ALONZO-OROZCO v. UNITED STATES; MARTINEZ-RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES; and ROSALES-ZAVALA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 250 F.3d 742 (first and second judgements) and 743 (third judgement).
No. 00-10305. REEVES v. OHIO BUREAU OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES ET AL. Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-10310. SHOMORIN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 229 F.3d 1161.
No. 00-10317. ASTELLO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 241 F.3d 965.
No. 00-10322. ARDLEY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 242 F.3d 989.