From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cantu Chapa v. U.S.

U.S.
Jun 28, 2010
561 U.S. 1021 (2010)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Chapa v. United States, U.S., 130 S. Ct. 3504 (2010), the Court vacated and remanded the Fifth Circuit's decision in United States v. Chapa, 354 Fed. Appx. 203 (5th Cir. 2009), "for further consideration in light of Padilla v. Kentucky."

Summary of this case from People v. Garcia
See 4 Summaries

Opinion

No. 09–9751.

06-28-2010

Dora Olga Cantu CHAPA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010).

Summaries of

Cantu Chapa v. U.S.

U.S.
Jun 28, 2010
561 U.S. 1021 (2010)

In Chapa v. United States, U.S., 130 S. Ct. 3504 (2010), the Court vacated and remanded the Fifth Circuit's decision in United States v. Chapa, 354 Fed. Appx. 203 (5th Cir. 2009), "for further consideration in light of Padilla v. Kentucky."

Summary of this case from People v. Garcia

In Chapa v. United States,U.S., 130 S. Ct. 3504 (2010), the Court vacated and remanded the Fifth Circuit's decision in United States v. Chapa, 354 Fed. Appx. 203 (5th Cir. 2009), "for further consideration in light of Padilla v. Kentucky."

Summary of this case from People v. Garcia

In Chapa v. United States, U.S., 130 S.Ct. 3504 (2010), the Court vacated and remanded the Fifth Circuit's decision in United States v. Chapa, 354 Fed.Appx. 203 (5th Cir. 2009), "for further consideration in light of Padilla v. Kentucky."

Summary of this case from People v. Paredes

In Chapa v. United States, U.S., 130 S.Ct. 3504 (2010), the Court vacated and remanded the Fifth Circuit's decision in United States v. Chapa, 354 Fed.Appx. 203 (5th Cir.2009), “for further consideration in light of Padilla v. Kentucky.” The Fifth Circuit, relying on precedent, Santos–Sanchez v. United States, 548 F.3d 227, 333–336 (5th Cir.2008), rejected the defendant's challenge to her attorney's effectiveness because counsel allegedly misrepresented the deportation consequences of her plea.

Summary of this case from People v. Paredes
Case details for

Cantu Chapa v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:DORA O. CANTU CHAPA v. UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 28, 2010

Citations

561 U.S. 1021 (2010)
130 S. Ct. 3504
177 L. Ed. 2d 1086

Citing Cases

State v. Luna

Furthermore, we reject his claim that the two remand orders he cites indicate the Supreme Court has deemed…

People v. Paredes

Finally, while the Supreme Court has not explicitly stated that Padilla v. Kentucky, supra, is applicable to…

5 Citing Cases